RISING CRIES FOR IMPEACHMENT: The Punch & Judy Show in Washington

These days we hear a good deal about something called impeachment, often coupled with references to Richard Nixon, though Nixon was not impeached, he resigned. Different countries go about things in different ways. In France, for instance, the president has immunity to any kind of criminal proceedings. The method of impeachment originated in England in the middle ages but has fallen into disuse. It has gone because in the UK it is much simpler just to pass a motion of no confidence which almost invariably causes the minister in question to resign. Impeachment is the start of a process (more or less complicated in the countries that use it) to remove somebody from office and/or punish them for wrong doing. The "and/or" here reveals a difficulty in the whole matter. In principle impeachment is supposed to be for dealing with powerful people who have committed serious crimes. It is tempting, however, to some groups in some circumstances, to see it as one way of deselecting a government member that they simply don't like. Much of the controversy in the USA at the moment hinges upon whether the president is (a) bad, (b) careless and inexperienced, or (c) simply possessed of a style alien to the established political culture in Washington. Option (c) seems pretty indisputable. Option (b) is arguable. Option (a) seems rather far fetched.

The whole storm around President Trump has been greatly magnified by the American assumption that Russia is "the enemy". Consequently, having anything to do with Russia tends to be seen as treachery. However, it is difficult to see how we can ever have peace in the world unless some reconciliation between America and Russia takes place. At the same time, Russia has suffered a good deal at the hands of the USA so it is not surprising that the Russians can hardly contain their amusement at the embarrassment that the USA is currently causing itself, hence Vladimir Putin's recent speech ironically saying that he might be forced to reprimand Lavrov for being “bad” and not sharing “these secrets neither with me nor with the Russian secret services, which is very inappropriate on his part.” This, of course, was pure sarcasm, implying that there were no such secrets and that the Americans were getting hot under the collar over a storm in a teacup. The Americans, however, are not in a humourous mood.

Perhaps the whole thing will blow over. Perhaps Trump will learn enough about political protocol to avoid stirring up quite so much controversy. On the other hand, one has the impression that by no means all of his controversial acts are accidental. He simply does not share the values of those around him and believes that right is on his side. He sees himself as the voice of a different kind of people from those who run the media and those who walk the corridors of Washington. Whether he can survive there himself will continue to be an open question for some time yet. His critics are over the top, but he is too. The truth of the matter surely lies somewhere in between. His provocative style together with the tendency of the American political class to take itself too seriously creates a mixture that oscillates between the explosive and the ludicrous. No doubt the show will go on and on. It is certainly bringing out Putin's talent for dry humour.

Views: 58

Replies to This Discussion

We have seen Trump behaving in a very peculiar way when cameras are around, it’s almost like he is performing, and then, some of his speeches start with him talking about ratings (well, some of the official phone calls with foreigner presidents and leaders included him mentioning how good his ratings were).

As you mention, it doesn’t seem that his controversial behavior is an accident, it looks more like he is in a reality show, he behaves like he is still in his TV show, and I’m not sure if he knows that being a president and being a reality show star are two different things. Seems to me he can’t tell the difference and in the meanwhile, he is causing a lot of damage… But at the same time, he has united people and nations. It looks like he has also strengthened science support in other countries and some research is getting not just stronger but also more serious. There is always some good, even during bad times.

Yes, political developments are often a series of actions and reactions. This leads to polarisation which can be a self-reinforcing process. Trump is now on his international trip and, if he does not amke any major mistakes, this may confirm some US alliances, but, in the process, drive some other countries into other camps. The position of the American government on climate change still remains unclear - it seems that Trump is not very interested in the issue except insofar as it impedes his industrial strategy. This, however, is probably also a reflection of the fact that those within his inner circle do not agree with each other. We shall see whether these disagreements on a wide range of issues within his team are now made better or worse by his engagement in overseas relations.

RSS

Events

ITZI Conference 2019

Subscribe to ITZI Conference Newsletter

* indicates required

Blog Posts

Running a Course in Korea and Elsewhere

Posted by David Brazier on August 3, 2018 at 1:40 2 Comments

I am currently leading courses on Buddhist psychology here in Seoul, Korea, but as I am putting the course onto this site as we go along, members of La Ville au Roi (Eleusis) are also responding so it is a bit as though the course is going on in several countries at the same time which is nice.

Varlam Shalamov

Posted by Geeta Chari on July 16, 2018 at 0:00 1 Comment

From The Paris Review:

For fifteen years the writer Varlam Shalamov was imprisoned in the Gulag for participating in “counter-revolutionary Trotskyist activities.” He endured six of those years enslaved in the gold mines of Kolyma, one of the coldest and most hostile places on earth. While he was awaiting sentencing, one of his short stories was…

Continue

The Buddha, Season 1, Episode 1

Posted by Geeta Chari on June 29, 2018 at 9:21 1 Comment

I have been watching The Buddha on Netflix, and although I came well-prepared to scoff, there is a surprising amount of food for thought from a Pureland perspective. What follows is a review of the Pureland touches in the episode, coloured inevitably by my upbringing in India, although I have now lived in Britain for more than half my life.

The scene opens in the republic of Kapilavastu, depicted as a green and pleasant land, with the Himalayan mountains as a backdrop. (I was…

Continue

Nembutsu Question

Posted by Dayamay Dunsby on April 20, 2018 at 8:22 1 Comment

I found this in a book that I'm reading. It has challenged my current "understanding" of the Nembutsu. I tend to think of the name itself as salvation and the bridge to the Pure Land...

"...Nembutsu is not a means to gain salvation but a reflection of it. Shinran acknowledges there is nembutsu without true entrusting because he lived in an environment where nembutsu was recited for benefits and merit. By itself it cannot produce true entrusting. Nevertheless, they are inseparable as…

Continue

© 2018   Created by David Brazier.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service