An item from 11 February 2006

This evening, at The Buddhist House, we had a seminar about Simone Weil (1909-1943), regarded by many as one of the foremost religious thinkers of the 20th century. We were particularly looking at how a person can be simultaneously a genius and a misfit, a much loved figure and an outcast, skilled and inept. Weil came from a secular Jewish backgroud in France and was exceptionally intelligent, yet over shadowed by her brother Andre who was even more intellectually gifted and became one of the great methematicians of the century. When Simone and Andre met they would converse in ancient Greek, just one of many languages she learnt. Simone early developed intense feelings about social oppression and


throughout her life supported left wing causes passionately, but not uncritically. She was one of the first leftist thinkers to criticize the Soviet Union for its inhumane policies under Stalin, and she quarrelled with Trotsky too. She gradually became disillusioned with the idea of revolution.

She was one of the first women to be admitted to the Ecole Normale Superieure, coming top in the national entrance exams, with Simone de Beauvoir second. This led to a career in teaching, but she frequently got dismissed for non-conformity and for her extra-curricula political activities. Her socialist convictions also led her to take jobs in factories and on farms to experience first hand the travail of the workers and she describes some of these experiences with compelling vividness in her extensive writings.

She is best known nowadays for her religious writings and convictions. She very much wanted to be a Catholic but could never reconcile herself to the history of the Church, its exclusiveness (non-Christians are damned), or to certain of its doctrines. She wrote: "When I read the cetachism of the Council of Trent, it seems as though I had nothing in common with the religion there set forth. When I read the New Testament, the mystics, the liturgy, when I watch the celebration of the mass, I feel with a sort of conviction that this faith is mine or, to be more precise, would be mine without the distance placed between it and me by my imperfection. This results in a painful spiritual state. I would like to make it, not less painful, only clearer. Any pain whatsoever is acceptable where there is clarity." (Letter to a Priest 1951, published by Routledge 2002). Weil believed that creation was the result of God withdrawing and that though God gives us the possibility of independence, we do best to refuse the gift: "God gave me being in order that I should give it back to him". "The self is only the shadow which sin and error cast by stopping the light of God, and I take this shadow for a self." Weil never had a sexual relationship and died young as a result of starving herself. Her best known books are The Need for Roots, Gravity and Grace and Oppression and Liberty.

The seminar stimulated some intense discussion. I imagine that she would have enjoyed it. She very much approved of education for its own sake.

Views: 67

Replies to This Discussion

Lovely. I have come across Weil often presented as a tragic gifted figure, but seldom have I heard her actual ideas discussed. I’d like to know more.

Weil had a great intuition in underlining the multifaceted nature of the concept of "person" and the need for acknowledging a further dimension that she called "the impersonal". This cannot be equated to the Buddhist not-self/anatta, however it represents a relevant contribution for us: in particular considering how the "impersonal" can be the basis for rethinking the relational side of our being human. She thought it in a rather utopian perspective, but such a vision can be helpful also within "realistic" attempts  in the interpretation or even orientation of  human interactions characterised by mindifulness and compassion.

See: Weil S. La personne et le sacré  

I can imagine that there must have been a lively discussion around Simone Weil's work and personality. Chriistiane Rancé has written a biography with the subtitle: " Le courage de l'impossible" I feel it clearly sums up Simone Weil being torn between her commitment to all concrete causes on the one hand and her mystical quest on the other hand, There are many other pardoxical aspects that one could point out: her trust in reason and intellectual understanding  and her sensitivity to beauty, particularly to music which appeared to her as  the real path to truth and joy; her belief in the necessity of changing the world by on'es own effort and the feeling that, at the same time,  the soul is exiled from this world.; the idea that God is in quest of us and not the opposite;. "L'idée qu'une quête de l'homme par Dieu est d'une splendeur et d'une profondeur insondables. Il y a décadence quand elle est remplacée par l'idée d'une quête de Dieu par l'homme". I wonder if on the spiritual path one does not always require "le courage de l'impossible"..

Simone Weil  taught for one year in a "lycée" in Bourges. Ther is  a plaque on the house where she lived: 7 place Gordaine

RSS

MAILING LIST

Subscribe to Global Sangha mailing list

Powered by EmailOctopus

Blog Posts

Thatcher Woods

Posted by Robert Joshin Althouse on February 26, 2021 at 22:52 0 Comments

Thatcher Woods

Posted by Robert Joshin Althouse on February 26, 2021 at 22:51 0 Comments

Metamorphosis

Posted by Robert Joshin Althouse on February 26, 2021 at 18:31 0 Comments

Blue Dream

Posted by Tineke Osterloh on February 22, 2021 at 9:57 0 Comments

© 2021   Created by David Brazier.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service